Skip to main content

Very Short Introduction to Humanism published


My Oxford University Press Very Short Introduction to Humanism was published on Thursday.
Labels:

Comments

The Atheist Missionary said…
Congratulations. Just pre-ordered on amazon.ca. Not available in Canada until the end of February. Estimated delivery March 2, 2011. Hate to wait that long because I would like to submit a review to Free Inquiry.
January 29, 2011 at 1:23 PM
Fergus Gallagher said…
Suggest add a direct (Amazon?) link.
January 29, 2011 at 3:45 PM
Stephen Law said…
I thought I had, Fergus. Can't you see it?
January 29, 2011 at 3:47 PM
Unknown said…
Excellent Stephen, this will be another great read as your other books. Ordering it now.
January 30, 2011 at 3:40 AM
Paul P. Mealing said…
Just checked it out on Amazon UK, where I procure most of my reading in science and philosophy.

Will probably order it when I've finished my current one, Why Beliefs Matter; Reflections on the Nature of Science by E. Brian Davies, Professor of Mathematics at King's College, London. More than half way through and a very stimulating read.

Regards, Paul.
January 30, 2011 at 6:00 AM
Anonymous said…
Congratulations!

The link is both visible and works from Norway.

Cassanders
In Cod we trust
January 31, 2011 at 9:40 AM
Tim Stephenson said…
Stephen, I have begun your new book. Firstly, most of us who who "organize under the banner of Humanism" have used the capital H for some time. I assume you adopted the small h for a reason? (maybe you explain this later in the book).
February 4, 2011 at 9:19 PM
Tim Stephenson said…
What is the difference between a "non-natural mathematics" and a "natural mathematics". Surely all Humanists are committed to some form of pluralistic naturalism.
February 4, 2011 at 9:39 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen...
159 comments
Read more

The Evil God Challenge and the "classical" theist's response

On another blog, FideCogitActio, some theists of a "classical" stripe (that's to say, like Brian Davies, Edward Feser) are criticisng the Evil God Challenge (or I suppose, trying to show how it can be met, or sidestepped). The main post includes this: In book I, chapter 39 , Aquinas argues that “there cannot be evil in God” (in Deo non potest esse malum). Atheists like Law must face the fact that, if the words are to retain any sense, “God” simply cannot be “evil”. As my comments in the thread at Feser’s blog aimed to show, despite how much he mocks “the privation theory of evil,” Law himself cannot escape its logic: his entire argument requires that the world ought to appear less evil if it is to be taken as evidence of a good God. Even though he spurns the idea that evil is a privation of good, his account of an evil world is parasitic on a good ideal; this is no surprise, though, since all evil is parasitic on good ( SCG I, 11 ). Based on the conclusions of se...
446 comments
Read more

Sye show continues

I was sent a link to this , for those interested in the never ending saga of Sye TenBruggencate and his "proof" of the existence of God. Hit "sinner ministries' proof of the existence of god" link below or on side bar for 30+ earlier posts on this topic that I wrote during an extended interchange with him last summer (check the literally many hundreds of comments attached to these posts if you really want to get into how Sye thinks and argues). Sye's amazing intial "proof" is available here . PS. For those interested, my own "presuppositional" proof, parodying Sye's proof by his principle "the impossibility of the contrary" (which turns out to be the key to Sye's proof) is: My claim: Sye's mind is addled and his thinking unreliable because he was hit on the head by a rock. Prove this is false, Sye. Try to, and I will say - "But your "proof" presupposes your mind is not addled and you can recognise a pr...
250 comments
Read more