Skip to main content

Schools events for RS philosophy and ethics - online or in person!

Teachers of Religious Studies! I'm a philosopher, academic (Oxford and London), and author of many introductory books, including books for children.

I've many years experience teaching young people philosophy.

I can offer your pupils sessions on philosophy and ethics tailored to your exact syllabus and to their specific needs. I can visit in person, or deliver sessions interactively via zoom, etc. - your choice.

For RS A Level I can cover all philosophical topics including Meta-Ethics, Religious Language, Ontological Argument, etc.

All sessions are accompanied by a detailed handout. Email me for a free sample handout on meta-ethics for OCR. stephen@thinking-big.uk

I am often also asked to run sessions for IB (esp. theory of knowledge), GCSE philosophy topics, and Gifted and Talented events.

I also produce classroom resources, such as this animation on the problem of evil: https://vimeo.com/186237056

Dr. John Taylor, Cranleigh School says: 'Stephen Law is a tremendous communicator of philosophy to young people. He has the rare gift of being able to make philosophy enjoyable and accessible without ever dumbing it down. I'd recommend him highly to anyone who wants their students to discover how philosophy can be intellectually challenging but great fun at the same time.'

If you think I might be able to help your students, do get in touch to discuss various options: stephen@thinking-big.uk

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen
159 comments
Read more

Aquinas on homosexuality

Thought I would try a bit of a draft out on the blog, for feedback. All comments gratefully received. No doubt I've got at least some details wrong re the Catholic Church's position... AQUINAS AND SEXUAL ETHICS Aquinas’s thinking remains hugely influential within the Catholic Church. In particular, his ideas concerning sexual ethics still heavily shape Church teaching. It is on these ideas that we focus here. In particular, I will look at Aquinas’s justification for morally condemning homosexual acts. When homosexuality is judged to be morally wrong, the justification offered is often that homosexuality is, in some sense, “unnatural”. Aquinas develops a sophisticated version of this sort of argument. The roots of the argument lie in thinking of Aristotle, whom Aquinas believes to be scientifically authoritative. Indeed, one of Aquinas’s over-arching aims was to show how Aristotle’s philosophical system is broadly compatible with Christian thought. I begin with a sketch of Arist
49 comments
Read more

Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism refuted

Here's my central criticism of Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN). It's novel and was published in Analysis last year. Here's the gist. Plantinga argues that if naturalism and evolution are true, then semantic epiphenomenalism is very probably true - that's to say, the content of our beliefs does not causally impinge on our behaviour. And if semantic properties such as having such-and-such content or being true cannot causally impinge on behaviour, then they cannot be selected for by unguided evolution. Plantinga's argument requires, crucially, that there be no conceptual links between belief content and behaviour of a sort that it's actually very plausible to suppose exist (note that to suppose there are such conceptual links is not necessarily to suppose that content can be exhaustively captured in terms of behaviour or functional role, etc. in the way logical behaviourists or functionalists suppose). It turns o
151 comments
Read more