Skip to main content

Heythrop College ranked no.2 in Push University Guide

Contact Us
Heythrop College University of London is ranked no.2 in the Push university guide (the top English university). Push (www.push.co.uk) is the leading independent guide to UK universities, student life, gap years, open days and student finance. Universities are assessed on the basis of five factors: finance; job prospects; academic standards; ease of entry and demand; and the level and range of extra-curricular activities and support.


If you are considering a BA in philosophy, get in touch. I am tutor for admissions. think AT royalinstitutephilosophy.org

Comments

Anonymous said…
the jobs prospect of Heythrop graduates score of 1,000 seems dubious.
Poetry Pleases! said…
Dear Stephen

I read Philosophy and Russian at University College, Oxford and have recently become a big fan of your work. Your 'evil god' challenge reminds me of a poem I once wrote:

ARGUMENT FROM DESPAIR

Would a loving God
Create a world like this?
My friend, you have got
To be taking the piss!

Best wishes from Simon R. Gladdish
Stephen Law said…
Many thanks Simon - I might use that on occasion, if that's ok with you... very pithy.
Poetry Pleases! said…
Dear Stephen

Be my guest! I would love you to use it.

Best wishes from Simon
Poetry Pleases! said…
Dear Stephen

I've just thought of another of my poems which might amuse you:

SUN, EARTH, MOON, MAN

The sun is a bell
Ringing out light.
Earth is a hell -
Tasteless and trite.

The moon's a balloon
Bobbing in space
And man is an ape
With a smirk on his face.

Best wishes from Simon R. Gladdish
Poetry Pleases! said…
Dear Stephen

Just for the akashic record, my three favourite contemporary philosophers are (in no particular order): you, Ray Monk and Julian Baggini.

Best wishes from Simon

P.S. I've clicked most of your 'liked' buttons on Amazon.

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen

What is Humanism?

What is Humanism? “Humanism” is a word that has had and continues to have a number of meanings. The focus here is on kind of atheistic world-view espoused by those who organize and campaign under that banner in the UK and abroad. We should acknowledge that there remain other uses of term. In one of the loosest senses of the expression, a “Humanist” is someone whose world-view gives special importance to human concerns, values and dignity. If that is what a Humanist is, then of course most of us qualify as Humanists, including many religious theists. But the fact remains that, around the world, those who organize under the label “Humanism” tend to sign up to a narrower, atheistic view. What does Humanism, understood in this narrower way, involve? The boundaries of the concept remain somewhat vague and ambiguous. However, most of those who organize under the banner of Humanism would accept the following minimal seven-point characterization of their world-view.

Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism refuted

Here's my central criticism of Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN). It's novel and was published in Analysis last year. Here's the gist. Plantinga argues that if naturalism and evolution are true, then semantic epiphenomenalism is very probably true - that's to say, the content of our beliefs does not causally impinge on our behaviour. And if semantic properties such as having such-and-such content or being true cannot causally impinge on behaviour, then they cannot be selected for by unguided evolution. Plantinga's argument requires, crucially, that there be no conceptual links between belief content and behaviour of a sort that it's actually very plausible to suppose exist (note that to suppose there are such conceptual links is not necessarily to suppose that content can be exhaustively captured in terms of behaviour or functional role, etc. in the way logical behaviourists or functionalists suppose). It turns o