Skip to main content

Illustrator needed

I am putting together a philosophy poster for my college and need an illustrator who can do, e.g. fun Quentin Blake style cartoon illustrations in colour. Preferably not too expensive! Anyone out there?

Comments

Try this: http://www.katy-jackson.co.uk/index.htm

Katy is a friend of mine and a fine illustrator (not sure how much she charges though!)
Not sure what your budget is but I would ask Ryan Dunlavey for a quote. He illustrated Action Philosophers! and I've found his quotes to be very reasonable.
Martin said…
I'm you man Stephen. See Cartoon 1 and Cartoon 2 for examples. I am in France 24/12 - 31/12 so I'll put a couple of bits together for you to see in January.
Martin said…
I'm you man Stephen. See Cartoon 1 and Cartoon 2 for examples. I am in France 24/12 - 31/12 so I'll put a couple of bits together for you to see in January.
Anonymous said…
You can see from the above I am a very quick typist, never mind how good my illustration skills are.
66 words typed, and 2 working hyperlinks, all done inside
1 minute!

A quick Winterval poem for you:

Ding dong bell,
Christmas is Hell,
Don't forget to celebrate,
Winterval as well!


or how about?

I wandered lonely as a crowd,
And of my socks I was not proud,
To me it seems more than absurd,
That a cumolo-nimbus weighs more t'han a bird.


Happy Festivities everyone,

Pogsurf
Karen said…
Hi, i'm a practising illustrator, link to my blog is http://2-littlepigs.blogspot.com/
Cheers, Karen
disco-mouth said…
Hi there, I am an illustrator based in London and I am very much interested in your project. Visit my website to see if you like my creations. I welcome direction and take your specifications seriously.

http://www.adamsonillustration.moonfruit.com/

Kind regards

Kate Adamson

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen...

The Evil God Challenge and the "classical" theist's response

On another blog, FideCogitActio, some theists of a "classical" stripe (that's to say, like Brian Davies, Edward Feser) are criticisng the Evil God Challenge (or I suppose, trying to show how it can be met, or sidestepped). The main post includes this: In book I, chapter 39 , Aquinas argues that “there cannot be evil in God” (in Deo non potest esse malum). Atheists like Law must face the fact that, if the words are to retain any sense, “God” simply cannot be “evil”. As my comments in the thread at Feser’s blog aimed to show, despite how much he mocks “the privation theory of evil,” Law himself cannot escape its logic: his entire argument requires that the world ought to appear less evil if it is to be taken as evidence of a good God. Even though he spurns the idea that evil is a privation of good, his account of an evil world is parasitic on a good ideal; this is no surprise, though, since all evil is parasitic on good ( SCG I, 11 ). Based on the conclusions of se...

Sye show continues

I was sent a link to this , for those interested in the never ending saga of Sye TenBruggencate and his "proof" of the existence of God. Hit "sinner ministries' proof of the existence of god" link below or on side bar for 30+ earlier posts on this topic that I wrote during an extended interchange with him last summer (check the literally many hundreds of comments attached to these posts if you really want to get into how Sye thinks and argues). Sye's amazing intial "proof" is available here . PS. For those interested, my own "presuppositional" proof, parodying Sye's proof by his principle "the impossibility of the contrary" (which turns out to be the key to Sye's proof) is: My claim: Sye's mind is addled and his thinking unreliable because he was hit on the head by a rock. Prove this is false, Sye. Try to, and I will say - "But your "proof" presupposes your mind is not addled and you can recognise a pr...