I'm genuinely grateful for all the feedback - positive and negative. I want to believe what's true, of course. So counter-arguments are to be welcomed - especially if they're good ones!
Apparently I will burn in hell for all eternity for failing to believe in Craig's God, if he exists. So would prefer not to get this wrong.
I'm in Sweden for a few days from tomorrow, so won't be posting much if at all.
I was asked to prepare some questions for Craig for the Q&A session at the end. In fact I was never given the opportunity to ask any. But I had prepared a couple. Here they are:
You claim to just know in your heart, with utter certainty, that God exists and Christianity is true.
I want you to imagine that you have become President of the United States. Imagine also that there’s a red button on the table.
You know that pressing the button will bring about a nuclear holocaust, unleash unimaginable horror, and bring about a nuclear winter that will render humankind extinct with a decade or two.
It now suppose it seems to you that God wants you to press the button. In fact it seems as clearly and unambiguously true that this is what God wants you to do as it seems true to you that God exists.
My question is: what would be the reasonable thing for you to do, and why?
[p.s. I am pretty sure Craig would say "Press the button". Which is worrying. Let's hope he never stands for office.]
You believe that every human knows in his or her heart that your God exists. So there’s no excuse for unbelief.
So am I just, well, lying when I say “There is no God”, and when I tell you I have no such inner knowledge? For, according to you, I'm telling you something that I know not to be true, right?
Follow up point: If I know God has not made himself known in my heart, but Craig’s God is one who makes himself known in every human heart, then I can know immediately that Craig’s God does not exist.
Prof Craig says he just knows his god exists. It turns out, that, if he's right, I can just know he doesn’t!