Skip to main content

Recording

Is anyone attending the craig debate in a position to make an audio recording of the entire exchange (from audience)?

Comments

Salim said…
Have you tried contacting James and Liz from The Pod Delusion? They are often up for that sort of thing.
Anonymous said…
I would have thought Westminster Hall had facilities for that kind of thing?
zer said…
Won't it be webcast live? I'm from India. Can't attend it.I've been waiting for years to see Craig meet a good match who understands his arguments. Could it please be made possible?
Jay44 said…
You do know that Premier Radio and UCCF are going to be recording all of the debates in Craig's Tour don't you?
JOJO JACOB said…
Tracy is a graphic designer. Not a sophisticated philosopher. I have never seem an argument like this from any so-called experts in philosophy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrSwn4-fitA
Anonymous said…
Get someone to set up your laptop to record in most cases the quality should be good enough particularly if you have a plug in mic
skydivephil said…
Ill be there and can do it and download it to your lap top there and then. Let me know if you want to facebook me: skydivephil
jbierly said…
oh I am so excited to hear this debate!!!!
JOJO JACOB said…
Lord craig says that the debates are going to a draw.

http://www.youtube.com/drcraigvideos
Mark Szlazak said…
The problem atheist have is that Craig has good reasons for his arguments for God and atheists don't have much in the way of good responses against God that Craig can't easily destroy and they don't have great arguments for naturalism nor atheism.

It isn't really about debating tactics but just the shabby state of the atheistic position.

What you can beat Craig on is particulars about the Christian faith like resurrection of Jesus, the trinity and so on.

The best way to beat him isn't from an atheistic perspective but from a supernatural perspective.

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen

Why I won't be voting Labour at the next General Election, not even to 'keep the Tories out'.

I have always voted Labour, and have often been a member of the Party, campaigning and canvassing for them. For what it’s worth, here’s my feeling about voting Labour next General Election:   1. When the left vote Labour after they move rightwards, they are encouraged to just move further right, to the point where they are now probably right of where e.g. John Major’s Tory party was. And each time the Tories go further right still. At some point we have got to stop fuelling this toxic drift to the right by making the Labour Party realise that it’s going to start costing them votes. I can’t think of anything politically more important than halting this increasingly frightening rightward slide. So I am no longer voting Labour. 2. If a new socialist party starts up, it could easily hoover up many of the 200k former LP members who have left in disgust (I’d join), and perhaps also pick up union affiliations. They could become the second biggest party by membership quite quickly. Our voting

Aquinas on homosexuality

Thought I would try a bit of a draft out on the blog, for feedback. All comments gratefully received. No doubt I've got at least some details wrong re the Catholic Church's position... AQUINAS AND SEXUAL ETHICS Aquinas’s thinking remains hugely influential within the Catholic Church. In particular, his ideas concerning sexual ethics still heavily shape Church teaching. It is on these ideas that we focus here. In particular, I will look at Aquinas’s justification for morally condemning homosexual acts. When homosexuality is judged to be morally wrong, the justification offered is often that homosexuality is, in some sense, “unnatural”. Aquinas develops a sophisticated version of this sort of argument. The roots of the argument lie in thinking of Aristotle, whom Aquinas believes to be scientifically authoritative. Indeed, one of Aquinas’s over-arching aims was to show how Aristotle’s philosophical system is broadly compatible with Christian thought. I begin with a sketch of Arist