Skip to main content

Will Kennedy


Just sticking this up because I love it, and because Will Kennedy is one of the world's most effortlessly groovy drummers.

POSTSCRIPT. I guess the irony won't be lost on some of you that this is a gospel tune, and that these guys are (mostly?) religious, especially Kennedy, who appeared at drummers for Jesus. Drummer Vinnie Colaiuta is also now a minister. I have also noticed that many drummers tend to be drawn to philosophy. Could there being a link between attraction to (skill at?) drumming and an attraction to thinking about the Big Questions? Probably not, but still, here's a bit of anecdotal evidence. Any more anecdotes on this theme?

Comments

Paul P. Mealing said…
Never heard it before, but thoroughly enjoyable.

I don't think I've ever seen that quartet combo before - like a jazz trio with a sax.

Personally, I liked the piano best - it's the glue. But I liked it when they were all flying together - you expect it to come unstuck but it doesn't.

Regards, Paul.
Excellent. But oh what crappy sound quality!
Oh, and Paul: If you haven't heard this quartet combo before but like it, check out some of the old recordings with Keith Jarrett, Jan Garbarek, Palle Danielsson, and Jon Christensen. “My Song” and “Nude Ants” are among my favourite albums.
Paul Hutton said…
Completely unrelated to this post, but thought you might find this new study interesting (via Mindhacks.com):

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18513-damaged-brains-escape-the-material-world.html

"Urgesi's team found that the 24 people with gliomas in the posterior parietal cortex tended to score higher on the self-transcendence test after surgery than they had before. By contrast, the scores of people with gliomas in the anterior region of the cortex, and of people with meningiomas, did not change after their surgery.

This suggests that it is the removal of neurons from the posterior parietal cortex which is responsible for the personality change, and not simply experiencing a serious illness or undergoing brain surgery, Urgesi says. He suggests that the removal reduces activity in this brain region and that this may increase feelings of transcendence."
Steve G said…
Hi Stephen,

I'd suggest that, what would seem like a relationship between interest in drumming and interest in the big questions, perhaps could be explained by more practical reasons. I'm a drummer and have been a drum teacher, and myself and many other drummers I know started drumming in Church and have since grew out of our religious beginnings. As drums, hardware, cymbals, etc are very expensive, and practice isn't exactly a very sociable activity, I've found that many young drummers have had there equipment provided for them by a church and can practice in a nice isolated church building. So my best guess would be that interest in the big questions, for many drummers, arose from the same environment that encouraged them to take up drumset as an instrument in the first place. Not sure about Vinnie or Will, but I know John Blackwell, Aaron spears, Eric Greene, Marvin McQuitty, Derico Watson, to name but a few, started there drumming careers in Church.

Your book 'The Philosophy Gym' amongst others, really started me out on the road to some serious thought on my previously very confused ideas about life, god, goodness. Thanks. Though I've been considering faking a belief in God for a convenient place to practice;-) Any other suggestions would be gratefully considered.
Stephen Law said…
Hi Steve

Ah, that's not a bad theory, actually. Free rehearsal space would be great. Perhaps I should feign religious belief myself?

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen...

The Evil God Challenge and the "classical" theist's response

On another blog, FideCogitActio, some theists of a "classical" stripe (that's to say, like Brian Davies, Edward Feser) are criticisng the Evil God Challenge (or I suppose, trying to show how it can be met, or sidestepped). The main post includes this: In book I, chapter 39 , Aquinas argues that “there cannot be evil in God” (in Deo non potest esse malum). Atheists like Law must face the fact that, if the words are to retain any sense, “God” simply cannot be “evil”. As my comments in the thread at Feser’s blog aimed to show, despite how much he mocks “the privation theory of evil,” Law himself cannot escape its logic: his entire argument requires that the world ought to appear less evil if it is to be taken as evidence of a good God. Even though he spurns the idea that evil is a privation of good, his account of an evil world is parasitic on a good ideal; this is no surprise, though, since all evil is parasitic on good ( SCG I, 11 ). Based on the conclusions of se...

Sye show continues

I was sent a link to this , for those interested in the never ending saga of Sye TenBruggencate and his "proof" of the existence of God. Hit "sinner ministries' proof of the existence of god" link below or on side bar for 30+ earlier posts on this topic that I wrote during an extended interchange with him last summer (check the literally many hundreds of comments attached to these posts if you really want to get into how Sye thinks and argues). Sye's amazing intial "proof" is available here . PS. For those interested, my own "presuppositional" proof, parodying Sye's proof by his principle "the impossibility of the contrary" (which turns out to be the key to Sye's proof) is: My claim: Sye's mind is addled and his thinking unreliable because he was hit on the head by a rock. Prove this is false, Sye. Try to, and I will say - "But your "proof" presupposes your mind is not addled and you can recognise a pr...