Skip to main content

Peter Singer on keeping New Year resolutions

Did you make any New Year’s resolutions? Perhaps you resolved to get fit, to lose weight, to save more money, or to drink less alcohol. Or your resolution may have been more altruistic: to help those in need, or to reduce your carbon footprint. But are you keeping your resolution? Continues here...

Comments

Anonymous said…
Richard Bartholomew, why have you not written the fourth segment today on CNN Connect the world, Have you heard the governor of Akwa Ibom State speak on this issue of child witch you and your humanist group have been accusing an innocent woman of God Helen Ukpabio and her church. Shame to all the atheists. All the money you have been making by accusing Helen ukpabio you will vomit now. Why not look for a job instead of getting involved in all this fraud. I saw the face of Mag Gavan a British fraudulent woman, I read failure on her face, she has failed. The Governor has disgraced you and your group. I am surprised you have not written on this topic you have been following segment by segment for days now, the fourth segment is missing in your blog. You can see how fraudulent you are by not letting the world know the truth. You lied to the whole world that the Governor of Akwa Ibom state is against Helen Ukpabio and her church. now the governor has been on air (CNN) since yesterday and you are pretending not to see it, Bartholomew shame on you, you said there is no God in heaven, now we will know if God exist or not. You and your group have been disgraced and all your scam has been exposed, I told you before and I am saying it again that all of you, Mag Gavan, Sam Ikpe Itaumah, Gary Foxcroft, Ed Brayton, Jeremy Rodell, Marie Therese o’ Loughlin, Kent Solomon, Stephen Law, Kelly Stowe, Richard’s concubine Amanda Jayne Archer, Mark oppenheimer of Yale University and his blackmailer wife Rachel, Leo Igwe (the murderer), and your news correspondent Christian Purefoy will soon face the law. Once again Richard, I challenge you in the name of our Lord Jesus to comment on Becky Anderson’s report on child witch Akwa Ibom state Nigeria (connect the world).

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen

Aquinas on homosexuality

Thought I would try a bit of a draft out on the blog, for feedback. All comments gratefully received. No doubt I've got at least some details wrong re the Catholic Church's position... AQUINAS AND SEXUAL ETHICS Aquinas’s thinking remains hugely influential within the Catholic Church. In particular, his ideas concerning sexual ethics still heavily shape Church teaching. It is on these ideas that we focus here. In particular, I will look at Aquinas’s justification for morally condemning homosexual acts. When homosexuality is judged to be morally wrong, the justification offered is often that homosexuality is, in some sense, “unnatural”. Aquinas develops a sophisticated version of this sort of argument. The roots of the argument lie in thinking of Aristotle, whom Aquinas believes to be scientifically authoritative. Indeed, one of Aquinas’s over-arching aims was to show how Aristotle’s philosophical system is broadly compatible with Christian thought. I begin with a sketch of Arist

Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism refuted

Here's my central criticism of Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN). It's novel and was published in Analysis last year. Here's the gist. Plantinga argues that if naturalism and evolution are true, then semantic epiphenomenalism is very probably true - that's to say, the content of our beliefs does not causally impinge on our behaviour. And if semantic properties such as having such-and-such content or being true cannot causally impinge on behaviour, then they cannot be selected for by unguided evolution. Plantinga's argument requires, crucially, that there be no conceptual links between belief content and behaviour of a sort that it's actually very plausible to suppose exist (note that to suppose there are such conceptual links is not necessarily to suppose that content can be exhaustively captured in terms of behaviour or functional role, etc. in the way logical behaviourists or functionalists suppose). It turns o