Skip to main content

PLANTINGA'S BELIEF-CUM-DESIRE ARGUMENT REFUTED

The journal Religious Studies is going to publish this paper. Thanks to everyone who commented - it was very useful. Final version of the paper is available here.

Comments

Larry Hamelin said…
<shrugs> My original criticism still stands.
Timmo said…
I agree with you about this, Stephen. Plantinga's argument in that part of the book is interesting, and the main thrust is his observation that for any action, there is some combination of beliefs and desires that will motivate the agent to perform that action. However, it is important to flesh out, as you do in your paper, how this connects up with his claim that evolution is incompatibile with naturalism. It's more complex than just showing one adaptive action can be generated by false beliefs. There's an entire system of beliefs and desires constantly interacting with the world, facing novel circumstances, and so on.
Paul P. Mealing said…
I admit I don't follow the esoteric minutiae of this argument, so I may be totally off course with this comment.

Talking about evolution, adaptation, cognitive abilities and beliefs, I'm struck by the fact that some of our beliefs concerning physics, particularly relativity theory and quantum mechanics, have no adaptive advantages at all, except in pursuing technology.

The fact is they defy our everyday common sense, yet we believe them to be true.

The reason being that at the scale we observe and interact with the world they are not evident, therefore there is no reason for these advanced cognitive perceptions to evolve.

I guess I'm pointing out something that is obvious to me: we have developed an ability to understand the universe at levels which are not necessary for our survival.

It's a case where belief and evolutionary advantage seem at odds, yet it's also a case where our unique human cognitive abilities have led us to a comprehension of the universe that goes beyond our imagination. This is something that has always intrigued me, personally.

I really don't know if this is relevant to Plantinga's thesis or not, but it does point to an example of beliefs being independent of the evolutionary process and provides a reason why: they don't affect our normal everyday interaction with the world.

Regards, Paul.
Bob said…
I really don't know if this is relevant to Plantinga's thesis or not, but it does point to an example of beliefs being independent of the evolutionary process and provides a reason why: they don't affect our normal everyday interaction with the world.

I can click my fingers, middle and thumb to get the attention of a waiter. This is a side effect of evolution, not something necessary to survival. Why wouldn't our ability to do science and similar reasoning be a side-effect of evolution? We evolved cognitive abilities that helped us survive, but are applicable to greater circumstances.

One of the problems I have with Plantinga's argument is this strict adaptationist view, that everything we can do must have evolved for a survival purpose and cannot be retooled for other purposes. Evolution is blind and purposeless, it makes do with whatever material we have and retools them for new purposes. Why wouldn't an evolved animal end up with capabilities that don't strictly have a survival purpose?
Paul P. Mealing said…
Hi Wat,

I agree with your comment. I'm just giving a very obvious example.

Regards, Paul.
Paul P. Mealing said…
Just to elaborate: I agree that this is an example of a by-product of evolution, which is why I raised it.

It's a case where beliefs appear to be irrelevant to evolutionary 'fitness'. So I think we agree on that.

I'm not defending Pantinga, because I don't know how evolution can be incompatible with a philosophy of 'naturalism', so I'm not addressing that per se.

I'm happy to leave that to Stephen.

Regards, Paul.
Brian said…
I was logged in as WAT before, forgot to log out of gmail. Anyway....

It's a case where beliefs appear to be irrelevant to evolutionary 'fitness'.

Well, I think the belief about whether the tiger is a safe animal to pat, etc, are relevant to fitness. That the same reasoning mechanisms can allow us to construct elaborate theories about nature and methods to test those theories (but never know if they are TRUE are further removed from fitness, but are still the same reasonings. I think that's what I mean. Then again, I'm probably being inconsistent or something. ;)
Paul P. Mealing said…
Hi Brian,

I just started reading a book called On the Origin of Stories, subtitled, Evolution, Cognition and Fiction, by a Kiwi academic, Brian Boyd. The title is a deliberate reference to Darwin's famous tome.

He looks at art, and storytelling in particular, in the context of evolution, starting with the role of play in primates and dolphins, as he believes that's where human 'art' evolved from. A very recent book, copyright 2009, but I'm interested in his thesis.

I once argued, in a letter to New Scientist, that art could be the human equivalent of the 'peacock's tail'.

Regards, Paul.
Brian said…

I once argued, in a letter to New Scientist, that art could be the human equivalent of the 'peacock's tail'.
Without having put any thought into it, I'd say that's a pretty good analogy. Artists, poets, etc do alright with the ladies, compared to the average cro-magnon. Art then could be about showing that one is so well endowed that one doesn't need to hunt all day, or has excess energy to burn. In other words, they're so fit, they can be arty, imagine what all that extra can do for the kids.....
John Pieret said…
Very good. On this point:

If a species also possesses perceptual faculties that are partly reliable and partly, but systematically, unreliable, there arises the possibility – perhaps the probability – that the members of this species will be able to figure out that they are, to some extent, being systematically misled by those faculties. In which case, they may well adjust their beliefs accordingly. Their beliefs would now reliably reflect reality, despite the fact that they possessed unreliable perceptual faculties. If R is the reliability of their cognitive faculties acting in tandem, the probability of R might still be high, even if it was more probable than not that they possessed unreliable perceptual faculties of type (2).

... don't we actually have an example of this in mirages? Our perceptual faculties evolved to to take in light and interpret our surroundings based on that information without considering the source of the light. Desert dwelling humans have figured out that they are systematically misled by those faculties and have learned to ignore the mirages.
John Pieret said…
P.S. Tom Scharle has brought up an interesting point that Plantinga's argument equally defeats Intelligent Design Creationism (which Plantinga supports) coupled with non-naturalism, since we cannot presume that this Designer had any motive or ability to give us reliable cognitive faculties.
Anonymous said…
Cool story you got here. I'd like to read more concerning that matter.
BTW look at the design I've made myself Overnight escort
Unknown said…
Hey friends,
I am Mohit Roy from Kolkata .Last Sunday I am in Delhi for some official work. After completing my work I returned back to hotel, feeling very lonely at that time. I think about for some fun with a girl who gives me girl friend experience. I searched on Google and found a girl belonging to independent Delhi Escorts Girls . Wow what a girl! I am totally surprised after seeing her. I can’t describe how much fun I had that night. She fulfills all my requirements. THANKS DELHI ESCORT HUB for being cooperative with me.
Anonymous said…
We have some special unique type Delhi Independent Escorts you never seen before.

All of our Delhi Escorts Beauties are charming and distinct with good sense of humour, witt , intelligence , well groomed, and most importantly Fashionable...

soniyo.in
Soumya Gupta said…
Hello Guys we are offering naughty call girls service for all of you, our selected model is under 19 to 24 year old, so you can take our Delhi call girls with full night fun, Our service is available in Delhi & NCR region, we are just a call away - 09999331982.

Visit our website:
Delhi Escort Girl - Delhi Escorts Service, Delhi Call Girls Agency - Escort in Delhi, Model Delhi Escort Service - Delhi Escort

Thanks
Soumya Gupta
Unknown said…
We have some special unique type Chandigarh Escort Service | Zirakpur Escort Service available with us you never seen before. All of our Mohali Escort Service Beauties are charming and distinct with good sense of humour, witt, intelligence , well groomed, and most importantly Fashionable...

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen...

The Evil God Challenge and the "classical" theist's response

On another blog, FideCogitActio, some theists of a "classical" stripe (that's to say, like Brian Davies, Edward Feser) are criticisng the Evil God Challenge (or I suppose, trying to show how it can be met, or sidestepped). The main post includes this: In book I, chapter 39 , Aquinas argues that “there cannot be evil in God” (in Deo non potest esse malum). Atheists like Law must face the fact that, if the words are to retain any sense, “God” simply cannot be “evil”. As my comments in the thread at Feser’s blog aimed to show, despite how much he mocks “the privation theory of evil,” Law himself cannot escape its logic: his entire argument requires that the world ought to appear less evil if it is to be taken as evidence of a good God. Even though he spurns the idea that evil is a privation of good, his account of an evil world is parasitic on a good ideal; this is no surprise, though, since all evil is parasitic on good ( SCG I, 11 ). Based on the conclusions of se...

Sye show continues

I was sent a link to this , for those interested in the never ending saga of Sye TenBruggencate and his "proof" of the existence of God. Hit "sinner ministries' proof of the existence of god" link below or on side bar for 30+ earlier posts on this topic that I wrote during an extended interchange with him last summer (check the literally many hundreds of comments attached to these posts if you really want to get into how Sye thinks and argues). Sye's amazing intial "proof" is available here . PS. For those interested, my own "presuppositional" proof, parodying Sye's proof by his principle "the impossibility of the contrary" (which turns out to be the key to Sye's proof) is: My claim: Sye's mind is addled and his thinking unreliable because he was hit on the head by a rock. Prove this is false, Sye. Try to, and I will say - "But your "proof" presupposes your mind is not addled and you can recognise a pr...