Skip to main content

SCIENCE AND RELIGION: Simon Singh, Mary Warnock, Jack Cohen, Stephen Law

Presented by Centre For Inquiry London and South Place Ethical Society

Saturday, 25th April, 10.30am-4pm.

A day exploring the relationship between science and religion

Venue: Conway Hall, 25 Red Lion Square, London WC1R 4RL.

£10 (£5 for students) BOOK NOW. Send a cheque payable to 'Center for Inquiry London” to: Executive Director Suresh Lalvani, Center for Inquiry London, at the above address. Alternatively pay by PAYPAL. Use the “Support CFI London” link at and follow the instructions.


11-12AM JACK COHEN. Why I believe in evolution - or in Omphalos!

The evidence for evolution converges from at least three directons: from the fossils, from the DNA sequences, and from contemporary examples (Darwin's finches, African cichlids, bacterial and insect resistance). “Creationism", or "Intelligent Design" are out because they don't explain, they haven't the Authority, and Grand Canyon/Flood ideas are simply absurd. But there are other choices, particularly if you Believe: the Plymouth Brother Philip Gosse wrote "Omphalos" a few years before Darwin's "...Origin..." (his son Edmund wrote "Father and Son'). The problem is that the rock column is genuinely and persuasively ancient, while the Bible insists on some thousands of years of history. God made Adam mature, with a navel (omphalos) and that's the clue... It's such a pretty idea, and makes so much more sense than the standard Creationist's story! If only there were a God, that's how It would've done it!

Jack Cohen is an internationally known reproductive biologist, who consulted for test-tube-baby and other infertility laboratories, and has worked in Assisted Conception Units. He was reproductive biologist in the Zoology Dept at Birmingham University for thirty years, later in Warwick Maths Institute for five where he was an Honorary Professor. His last position, at Warwick University, bridged the Ecosystems Unit of the Biology Dept and the Mathematics Institute, and his brief included bringing more science to more public awareness – which he still attempts.

12-1pm SIMON SINGH. Big Bang – the gospel according to Monsignor Georges LemaĆ®tre

Simon Singh, author of best-selling scientific and mathematical books including Big Bang, Fermat’s Last Theorem and Trick or Treatment?: Alternative Medicine on Trial, will talk about the Big Bang model and how science develops its theories. He will also explain how the concept of the Big Bang was initially developed by George Lemaitre, who successfully combined his careers as a cosmologist and a priest.

2-3pm STEPHEN LAW. Empirical evidence against the God hypothesis

Stephen Law is Provost of CFI London, senior lecturer in Philosophy at Heythrop College University of London, and author of philosophy books including The War For Children’s Minds (about faith schools), The Philosophy Files (for children 12+) and The Philosophy Gym (which includes dialogues such as “The Strange Case of The Rational Dentist” and “What’s Wrong With Gay Sex?”).

Stephen will look at what appears to be powerful empirical evidence against the existence of the Judeo-Christian God, and at how the faithful respond to that evidence.

3-4pm BARONESS MARY WARNOCK. Religion as humanism

Baroness Mary Warnock is one of the Britain’s leading public figures. She is perhaps best known for her recently expressed views on assisted suicide, and her role in the production of the Warnock report - an inquiry into human fertilisation by the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology, which she chaired.

Legal stuff: CFI reserves the right to change or cancel events without notice.


Alex Edward said…
love it, As a kid i was enamored by some of the splices Mountain Bell Used on our junction box, bright reds and greens, they looked like jewels or candy.
ugg australia
Alex Edward said…
Your blog is really helps for my search and i really like it.. Thanks a lot..:)
Piano sheet music
Alex Mick said…
Excellent posts to read keep it up and keep going on this way. And keep sharing these types of things Thanks
Glasgow accommodation
Glasgow bed and breakfast
S.S said…
Nice. This is definitely great info. I appreciate you posting this! More like it soon please! :)
keyboard sheet music
Alex Edward said…
Very informative article. For my web site to generate relevant traffic which key word should i choose, means how to judge any key words effectiveness can you suggest me? my web site is about consultancy for business. thanks
winchester shotshell primer
caldwell shooting accessories
Alex Edward said…
Two great talkers will not travel far together. Every one has there own point of view and same goes to this one..
reloading equipment
bookmarking said…
Nice post on this topic. I like your blog very much because it has very helpful articles on various topics like different culture and the latest news. I am a googler and search on many topics. By searching I found this nice website.

commercial playground
commercial play structures
commercial playground equipment
Alex Mick said…
Very good information, nice to find something of use to me keep up the good work, would be nice to see more from you.
Sisley cosmetics
Sisley skincare
Alex Edward said…
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along.
ugg sandals
ugg slippers
This is such a Great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. It gives in depth information. Thanks for this valuable information.
Very good website you have established. i enjoyed reading this blog.

Popular posts from this blog


(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen

What is Humanism?

What is Humanism? “Humanism” is a word that has had and continues to have a number of meanings. The focus here is on kind of atheistic world-view espoused by those who organize and campaign under that banner in the UK and abroad. We should acknowledge that there remain other uses of term. In one of the loosest senses of the expression, a “Humanist” is someone whose world-view gives special importance to human concerns, values and dignity. If that is what a Humanist is, then of course most of us qualify as Humanists, including many religious theists. But the fact remains that, around the world, those who organize under the label “Humanism” tend to sign up to a narrower, atheistic view. What does Humanism, understood in this narrower way, involve? The boundaries of the concept remain somewhat vague and ambiguous. However, most of those who organize under the banner of Humanism would accept the following minimal seven-point characterization of their world-view.

Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism refuted

Here's my central criticism of Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN). It's novel and was published in Analysis last year. Here's the gist. Plantinga argues that if naturalism and evolution are true, then semantic epiphenomenalism is very probably true - that's to say, the content of our beliefs does not causally impinge on our behaviour. And if semantic properties such as having such-and-such content or being true cannot causally impinge on behaviour, then they cannot be selected for by unguided evolution. Plantinga's argument requires, crucially, that there be no conceptual links between belief content and behaviour of a sort that it's actually very plausible to suppose exist (note that to suppose there are such conceptual links is not necessarily to suppose that content can be exhaustively captured in terms of behaviour or functional role, etc. in the way logical behaviourists or functionalists suppose). It turns o