Skip to main content

My Flickr page

I have started a black and white photography photostream at flickr under the name stephenwilliamlaw, if anyone is interested...

Comments

Anonymous said…
Why is it that black and white photos seem to capture detail in a far higher way? I suspect it has something to do with the way our eye retina cells work... anyone know?
Stephen Law said…
No I don't. You're right though, I think....
Jac said…
I love your "portrait of T and A, taken by window, natural light" and "camping." You do beautiful work.
Stephen Law said…
Thanks Jackie. Glad you like camping one as I do too, but not many others like it so much.
Anonymous said…
Stephen - have you read Roger Scuton's famous essay on why photography is not an art (I only ask since you just addressed something by him). If so, your thoughts?
Sally_bm said…
I love the camping and muddy walk ones, they make me feel very reminiscent :-) And the mountain ones look sooo striking in black and white. I'd never lug a big camera all the way up there though- I'm one of the "chop the end of your toothbrush off and eat off a compass" people!

Very nice, thanks for sharing them.
Stephen Law said…
Hi Kosh - no haven't read it - have you?
Anonymous said…
No I have not read it either, yet. Supposedly his argument is quite neat.

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen

What is Humanism?

What is Humanism? “Humanism” is a word that has had and continues to have a number of meanings. The focus here is on kind of atheistic world-view espoused by those who organize and campaign under that banner in the UK and abroad. We should acknowledge that there remain other uses of term. In one of the loosest senses of the expression, a “Humanist” is someone whose world-view gives special importance to human concerns, values and dignity. If that is what a Humanist is, then of course most of us qualify as Humanists, including many religious theists. But the fact remains that, around the world, those who organize under the label “Humanism” tend to sign up to a narrower, atheistic view. What does Humanism, understood in this narrower way, involve? The boundaries of the concept remain somewhat vague and ambiguous. However, most of those who organize under the banner of Humanism would accept the following minimal seven-point characterization of their world-view.

Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism refuted

Here's my central criticism of Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN). It's novel and was published in Analysis last year. Here's the gist. Plantinga argues that if naturalism and evolution are true, then semantic epiphenomenalism is very probably true - that's to say, the content of our beliefs does not causally impinge on our behaviour. And if semantic properties such as having such-and-such content or being true cannot causally impinge on behaviour, then they cannot be selected for by unguided evolution. Plantinga's argument requires, crucially, that there be no conceptual links between belief content and behaviour of a sort that it's actually very plausible to suppose exist (note that to suppose there are such conceptual links is not necessarily to suppose that content can be exhaustively captured in terms of behaviour or functional role, etc. in the way logical behaviourists or functionalists suppose). It turns o