Skip to main content

Philosophy in Schools seminar

I am involved in the launch of Philosophy in Schools, a book about - philosophy in schools. If you wish to attend next Wednesday (free wine), see this link, or below.

Flyer for book here.

Philosophy in Schools Seminar

What is Philosophy in Schools?

Philosophy in Schools is a collection of original philosophical essays that together make a robust case for teaching philosophy in schools. Leading philosophers of education explode the myth that philosophy is somehow too difficult or abstract for children to set out a series of compelling articles for its inclusion in the school curriculum.

Philosophy in Schools Seminar
When: Wednesday 2 July 4PM - to 6PM
Where: Clarke Hall, Institute of Education, University of London

Professor Robert Fisher (Brunel University)
Dr Michael Hand (Institute of Education)
Dr Stephen Law (Heythrop College, University of London)
Dr Judith Suissa (Institute of Education, University of London)
Dr Carrie Winstanley (Roehampton University)

The seminar will be followed by a wine reception sponsored by Continuum. Copies of the book will be available at a 35% discount.

How to book:
RSVP to or


Sally_bm said…
Out of interest, do you know of, and if so what do you think of, the P4C- philosophy for children- stuff?
Anonymous said…

I am truly interested in philosphy for children and would love to read this collection of essays. But 70 pounds?? 45 pounds with the discount? Seriously?

I can author a hard back, full colour, print on demand book which will then cost me $50 plus delivery. A paperback, or black and white text-only book can be printed for far less.

Surely if you want to get the message out, there are better ways of doing this?
Stephen Law said…
I have to agree John. It's ridiculously priced.
Stephen Law said…
The P4C stuff is ok, I think. Sapere are the people to tel you more about it. My view is their community of inquiry approach needs supplementing with some critical thinking input or it can into a sort of rambling stream of consciousness rather than a logical, structured debate.

Nevertheless the CoI approach does show major benefits, even without such a supplement.
Stephen Law said…
John - actually, I have one spare copy to get rid of. Want it for £20? Email me if you do...

Popular posts from this blog


(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen

What is Humanism?

What is Humanism? “Humanism” is a word that has had and continues to have a number of meanings. The focus here is on kind of atheistic world-view espoused by those who organize and campaign under that banner in the UK and abroad. We should acknowledge that there remain other uses of term. In one of the loosest senses of the expression, a “Humanist” is someone whose world-view gives special importance to human concerns, values and dignity. If that is what a Humanist is, then of course most of us qualify as Humanists, including many religious theists. But the fact remains that, around the world, those who organize under the label “Humanism” tend to sign up to a narrower, atheistic view. What does Humanism, understood in this narrower way, involve? The boundaries of the concept remain somewhat vague and ambiguous. However, most of those who organize under the banner of Humanism would accept the following minimal seven-point characterization of their world-view.

Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism refuted

Here's my central criticism of Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN). It's novel and was published in Analysis last year. Here's the gist. Plantinga argues that if naturalism and evolution are true, then semantic epiphenomenalism is very probably true - that's to say, the content of our beliefs does not causally impinge on our behaviour. And if semantic properties such as having such-and-such content or being true cannot causally impinge on behaviour, then they cannot be selected for by unguided evolution. Plantinga's argument requires, crucially, that there be no conceptual links between belief content and behaviour of a sort that it's actually very plausible to suppose exist (note that to suppose there are such conceptual links is not necessarily to suppose that content can be exhaustively captured in terms of behaviour or functional role, etc. in the way logical behaviourists or functionalists suppose). It turns o