Skip to main content

Fox News welcomes the Discovery Institute

For your amusement. Thanks to Stephen Twigg.

This is also worth a look re the same Fox broadcast (from Flock of Dodos):


Want to see the original (perhaps somewhate intemperately titled) pulled video? It is now here:



Fox News, eh?

Comments

Paul P. Mealing said…
Very entertaining and informative.

This is typically what I've found with 'creationist' arguments. Someone with a little knowledge will always win an argument against someone with no knowledge, but when they come up against a real 'expert' the boot is always on the other foot .

The real insight here is that the Discovery Institute would attempt to bully someone off the internet, who demonstrates their ignorance and duplicity, even though they were aware of his legal right to do so.

This is more than censorship, it's paranioa. Luckily he wasn't criticising Islamic fundamentalists, otherwise they'd want his head, literally.

Regards, Paul.
Anonymous said…
evolutionary ( theory of common descent)
proponents have come nowhere close to providing empirical evidence of abiogenesis. I believed in evolution until I began to study biochemistry, genetics and physiology. There is no doubt that existing sets of DNA information aquire changes with time. However, those who support (tocd) cannot provide empirical evidence of the origin of a cell.

Popular posts from this blog

Why I won't be voting Labour at the next General Election, not even to 'keep the Tories out'.

I have always voted Labour, and have often been a member of the Party, campaigning and canvassing for them. For what it’s worth, here’s my feeling about voting Labour next General Election:   1. When the left vote Labour after they move rightwards, they are encouraged to just move further right, to the point where they are now probably right of where e.g. John Major’s Tory party was. And each time the Tories go further right still. At some point we have got to stop fuelling this toxic drift to the right by making the Labour Party realise that it’s going to start costing them votes. I can’t think of anything politically more important than halting this increasingly frightening rightward slide. So I am no longer voting Labour. 2. If a new socialist party starts up, it could easily hoover up many of the 200k former LP members who have left in disgust (I’d join), and perhaps also pick up union affiliations. They could become the second biggest party by membership quite quickly. Our voting

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen

Aquinas on homosexuality

Thought I would try a bit of a draft out on the blog, for feedback. All comments gratefully received. No doubt I've got at least some details wrong re the Catholic Church's position... AQUINAS AND SEXUAL ETHICS Aquinas’s thinking remains hugely influential within the Catholic Church. In particular, his ideas concerning sexual ethics still heavily shape Church teaching. It is on these ideas that we focus here. In particular, I will look at Aquinas’s justification for morally condemning homosexual acts. When homosexuality is judged to be morally wrong, the justification offered is often that homosexuality is, in some sense, “unnatural”. Aquinas develops a sophisticated version of this sort of argument. The roots of the argument lie in thinking of Aristotle, whom Aquinas believes to be scientifically authoritative. Indeed, one of Aquinas’s over-arching aims was to show how Aristotle’s philosophical system is broadly compatible with Christian thought. I begin with a sketch of Arist