Skip to main content

UFO speakers

I am looking for good UK-based speakers knowledgeable about alien-related matters - UFOs, SETI, etc. Can anyone recommend anyone?

No wackos obviously - I need credible people with some genuine expertise...

Comments

Chris said…
Nick Pope is the usual suspect, isn't he?

http://www.nickpope.net/
Giford said…
You could enquire at Fortean Times. They organise an annual UnConvention with a wide array of speakers on subjects including - but not limited to - UFOs. They should have some contacts you're after.

Gif
georgesdelatour said…
Stephen

Have you read David Grinspoon's "Lonely Planets: The Natural Philosophy Of Alien Life"? Grinspoon is a serious astrophysicist - he's the world's leading expert on the planet Venus - so he's not a loony.

Grinspoon is based in the US, unfortunately.

http://www.funkyscience.net/
Atrueoriginall said…
Pope is overdone these days. Too many radio and tv shows and he's getting way too repetitive.

Good choices would be Philip Mantle, Gary Heseltine, Timothy Good, but my personal first choice would probably be....

Robert Rosamond

The link will take you to an article he wrote a ways back.
IQXS said…
Some very interesting suggestions! :) I have broadcasted your request on my Twitter feed. Hope it helps. And I agree with that Blue Alien... :)
Pope is overdone right now. He even has started sounding bored with himself...and the questions posed to him.

The LINK to this post has been Twittered at http://twitter.com/IQXS and shared with 1,090+ die-hard UFO Twit-thusiasts galaxy-wide. We track the latest in UFO/Alien Affairs News, Views, Pix and Vids.

Come join the loop and be in the know. Tin foil hats, optional! ;) ATT: We do not re-post videos or data, we only share the link to yours. Ciao!
Stephen Law said…
Great - thanks for the suggestions.
Nigel said…
Nick Cook, not to be confused with Nick Pope, is an Aviation Journalist who has worked for Janes Defence Weekly amongst others, and is an authority on the U.S. Aurora anti-gravity program. Check out his homepage High Frontiers. Thought provoking work on flying saucers.

Alternatively, in Australia there is Professor Ross Taylor who was the geochemist to first analyze the moon rocks of the Apollo missions. He has a book called Destiny or Chance which argues the difficulty of making Earth like Planets and thus extra terrestrial life! Great for background research and if you can get him Ross’s friend, Harrison (Jack) Schmidt the last Apollo astronaut and the first geologist on the moon.
wombat said…
Off topic but I recall a while you suggested doing a sort of atheist Alpha course, so I wondered if you might find this new Channel 4 offering interesting.

Revelations "Afforded complete access to one Alpha course, at St Aldate's Church in Oxford, [...] documents the whole process over its eight weeks."
Anonymous said…
The British National Space Centre might be able to recommend someone.
Anonymous said…
UFO is a term used to describe any aerial object that is not otherwise easily explained or described. UFO sightings have occurred throughout history. In fact, paranormal light sightings like shooting stars or the northern lights could be described as UFOs by observers in history who did not know how to identify such occurrences. Photos and video proof of UFO sightings can shed some light on the question, are UFOs and aliens real or an elaborate hoax? Find out more at http://ufos.org
ufos ufos said…
I found all I needed to know in your article. You deserve a pat on the back.
ufos ufos said…
There's no point in looking any further than your article for more information on this subject. You did a pretty good job in writing it.
Joe McGonagle said…
You might want to consider Dr. David Clarke - see:

http://www.drdavidclarke.co.uk/

and

http://drdavidclarke.blogspot.com/

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen...

The Evil God Challenge and the "classical" theist's response

On another blog, FideCogitActio, some theists of a "classical" stripe (that's to say, like Brian Davies, Edward Feser) are criticisng the Evil God Challenge (or I suppose, trying to show how it can be met, or sidestepped). The main post includes this: In book I, chapter 39 , Aquinas argues that “there cannot be evil in God” (in Deo non potest esse malum). Atheists like Law must face the fact that, if the words are to retain any sense, “God” simply cannot be “evil”. As my comments in the thread at Feser’s blog aimed to show, despite how much he mocks “the privation theory of evil,” Law himself cannot escape its logic: his entire argument requires that the world ought to appear less evil if it is to be taken as evidence of a good God. Even though he spurns the idea that evil is a privation of good, his account of an evil world is parasitic on a good ideal; this is no surprise, though, since all evil is parasitic on good ( SCG I, 11 ). Based on the conclusions of se...

Sye show continues

I was sent a link to this , for those interested in the never ending saga of Sye TenBruggencate and his "proof" of the existence of God. Hit "sinner ministries' proof of the existence of god" link below or on side bar for 30+ earlier posts on this topic that I wrote during an extended interchange with him last summer (check the literally many hundreds of comments attached to these posts if you really want to get into how Sye thinks and argues). Sye's amazing intial "proof" is available here . PS. For those interested, my own "presuppositional" proof, parodying Sye's proof by his principle "the impossibility of the contrary" (which turns out to be the key to Sye's proof) is: My claim: Sye's mind is addled and his thinking unreliable because he was hit on the head by a rock. Prove this is false, Sye. Try to, and I will say - "But your "proof" presupposes your mind is not addled and you can recognise a pr...