Skip to main content

Centre for Inquiry CARL SAGAN T-shirts now available

You can go to an on-line store here. We are not making any profit on these - but if you want to donate a couple of quid, go to www.cfiuk.org and hit the "Support CFI UK" button.

The Sagan picture shirts are on white or light colour only. Otherwise choose any colour you want. Hit the shirt to get the colour options.

I might pull the picture shirts shortly, depending on copyright issues, so if you want one get in right now!

These T-shirts are all Carl Sagan themed. Later, if I feel inspired, I may do e.g. a twee "Russell's Teapot" and an all-action "Bullshit Force!" (perhaps based on the A-Team, only with Russell, Sagan, Dawkins, and Randi as Mr T) version.
Labels:

Comments

Jac said…
The link isn't working for me. I like the Russle's Teapot shirt idea.
November 25, 2008 at 9:32 PM
Stephen Law said…
Link stopped working but is working again now I think, Jackie.

Will sort out Russell's teapot.
November 26, 2008 at 9:57 AM
Kyle Szklenski said…
Um, does this mean we American's cannot order the t-shirts? I tried, and there's no "U.S." option for the address country.

If anyone would like to buy us a few shirts and send them, we'd pay good money for them. :) We'd need a woman's small, man's large, and man's medium.
November 26, 2008 at 12:07 PM
Stephen Law said…
I'll post you some. Give me bit to sort out how. Maybe you could pay me via paypal?

The other thing is - I can send you the image and you can just whip up your own versions at an equivalent US site, of which I'm sure there are many.
November 26, 2008 at 12:34 PM
Kyle Szklenski said…
I could pay via Paypal fairly easily. My Jackie says she might rather wait for Russell's Teapot, though. I rather like that one, too. Yeah, maybe we'll just wait. Thanks though!
November 26, 2008 at 11:29 PM
Anonymous said…
There seems to be a typo on the long sleeved shirt - you might want to check it. (applie pie)?
November 28, 2008 at 1:02 PM
Stephen Law said…
I have put up a Russell's teapot. But perhaps not to Jackie's taste? let me know.

I could do one with Russell's face in the teapot, or bigger teapot, or ....
November 28, 2008 at 1:41 PM
Stephen Law said…
There are badges and mugs too, now. I don't suppose we'll sell many - or perhaps any. But fun designing them.
November 28, 2008 at 4:48 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen...
159 comments
Read more

The Evil God Challenge and the "classical" theist's response

On another blog, FideCogitActio, some theists of a "classical" stripe (that's to say, like Brian Davies, Edward Feser) are criticisng the Evil God Challenge (or I suppose, trying to show how it can be met, or sidestepped). The main post includes this: In book I, chapter 39 , Aquinas argues that “there cannot be evil in God” (in Deo non potest esse malum). Atheists like Law must face the fact that, if the words are to retain any sense, “God” simply cannot be “evil”. As my comments in the thread at Feser’s blog aimed to show, despite how much he mocks “the privation theory of evil,” Law himself cannot escape its logic: his entire argument requires that the world ought to appear less evil if it is to be taken as evidence of a good God. Even though he spurns the idea that evil is a privation of good, his account of an evil world is parasitic on a good ideal; this is no surprise, though, since all evil is parasitic on good ( SCG I, 11 ). Based on the conclusions of se...
446 comments
Read more

Sye show continues

I was sent a link to this , for those interested in the never ending saga of Sye TenBruggencate and his "proof" of the existence of God. Hit "sinner ministries' proof of the existence of god" link below or on side bar for 30+ earlier posts on this topic that I wrote during an extended interchange with him last summer (check the literally many hundreds of comments attached to these posts if you really want to get into how Sye thinks and argues). Sye's amazing intial "proof" is available here . PS. For those interested, my own "presuppositional" proof, parodying Sye's proof by his principle "the impossibility of the contrary" (which turns out to be the key to Sye's proof) is: My claim: Sye's mind is addled and his thinking unreliable because he was hit on the head by a rock. Prove this is false, Sye. Try to, and I will say - "But your "proof" presupposes your mind is not addled and you can recognise a pr...
250 comments
Read more