Skip to main content

Philosophy of Xmas

The Xmas Files book is available in bookshops now!

Contains such perrennial questions as: What should I do about the horrible tie Aunt Gertrude gave me? Is Xmas really about love and peace? and: What's so bad about Christmas kitsch?

Comments

Jac said…
Oh, wow. Sounds great. When I was a semi-Christian theist, I was put off by the commercialization of Xmas. Now that am an atheist, that's all I have left - that and tradition. But tradition is only worth keeping if it works in the first place. I have no urge to chop down a tree and mount it in my house. My family used to have a fabulous Xmas tradition of spending Xmas day at my uncle's house with most of the rest of my mother's family. That tradition died with my uncle a couple years ago. Now the family is so spread out that big get-togethers are almost impossible.

Dear Stephen,

For several years I've told my family not to get me anything for Xmas, both because Xmas is meaningless and I don't want anything they could get me, but they usually get me stuff anyway. Usually it's stuff I didn't want. This year I'm going to ask them to donate to the Secular Coalition of America for me. I'm donating to my parent's causes for their gifts. I'm thinking of getting my brother a pet nail trimmer to lesson the likelihood of his poodle scratching my legs when I visit. I have no idea what to do for my sister. She has way too much stuff as it is. She could use some more common sense, logic, rationality, a better marriage, a few fewer pets, more free time... things I can't give her. What should I do?

Sighned, Grinch in MA
Stephen Law said…
Why, my book is the ideal gift in such circumstances!
Anonymous said…
I read the book a good few years ago - it's a great introduction to some key philosophical themes.
Brian said…
Stephen, I'd love to read your book and you can send to me as a gift. :)

My wife has banned me from buying philosophy books as I overdo it. Perhaps I need a book on self-control......
Freethinker said…
I bought half-a-dozen copies last year as gifts for my family (the *only* gift I gave out last year). I thought they'd benefit from it, assuming they bothered to read it.
Christopher said…
I've got my dad a signed copy of A.C Grayling's new book on scepticism. However upon reading the first few chapters I realised it's really not that accesible to anybody who isnt versed in some philosophical terms.. Maybe I could buy a signed copy of your book for him instead Stephen? I'l be seeing you in Logic at Heythrop tommorow anyway!
Stephen Law said…
Ok Christopher I'll bring one in...
Anonymous said…
Looks like a bargain for £0.01. Wonder what that is in euro?

*ducks*
Stephen Law said…
Christopher - I shall leave a copy in my pigeonhole. Go to reception to ask for it. Left Monday 8th Dec 4pm.
Anonymous said…
Pardon me for posting on a slighly dated thread but it sort of seemed appropriate.

Study examines motives behind Santa myth


The researchers seem to be keen to tackle the big one next...

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen

Why I won't be voting Labour at the next General Election, not even to 'keep the Tories out'.

I have always voted Labour, and have often been a member of the Party, campaigning and canvassing for them. For what it’s worth, here’s my feeling about voting Labour next General Election:   1. When the left vote Labour after they move rightwards, they are encouraged to just move further right, to the point where they are now probably right of where e.g. John Major’s Tory party was. And each time the Tories go further right still. At some point we have got to stop fuelling this toxic drift to the right by making the Labour Party realise that it’s going to start costing them votes. I can’t think of anything politically more important than halting this increasingly frightening rightward slide. So I am no longer voting Labour. 2. If a new socialist party starts up, it could easily hoover up many of the 200k former LP members who have left in disgust (I’d join), and perhaps also pick up union affiliations. They could become the second biggest party by membership quite quickly. Our voting

Aquinas on homosexuality

Thought I would try a bit of a draft out on the blog, for feedback. All comments gratefully received. No doubt I've got at least some details wrong re the Catholic Church's position... AQUINAS AND SEXUAL ETHICS Aquinas’s thinking remains hugely influential within the Catholic Church. In particular, his ideas concerning sexual ethics still heavily shape Church teaching. It is on these ideas that we focus here. In particular, I will look at Aquinas’s justification for morally condemning homosexual acts. When homosexuality is judged to be morally wrong, the justification offered is often that homosexuality is, in some sense, “unnatural”. Aquinas develops a sophisticated version of this sort of argument. The roots of the argument lie in thinking of Aristotle, whom Aquinas believes to be scientifically authoritative. Indeed, one of Aquinas’s over-arching aims was to show how Aristotle’s philosophical system is broadly compatible with Christian thought. I begin with a sketch of Arist